In writing to you from Canada one might expect my perspective to be a little different. My view of our profession is that it is a professional highly motivation toward development /education. From my experience in Canada & Britain, nearly everyone seems to be studying for their Orthopaedic Division Exams, MSc, PhD, DSc. etc. I have every reason to suspect it's the same in Aus. Of course there are people who don't study (much), may-be they do short courses here and there but don't seem to have the courage or interest to incorporte their new knowledge into their practice.
I live in an isolated small community. The nearest city (and also community of physios) is 3-4 hours drive away. I've never had the privalidge of working in a practice where I could receive knowledgable mentoring, and so I can empathise with some of your comments. I have been fortunate to be able to riggle my way onto some pretty high-power courses where I wasn't really qualified to be (everyone else had their Fellowship in manual therapy) and I've been motivated by the very high level of manual skills I have witnessed in these therapist, but I have also surprised at the lack of skill /practice /conficence some of them have displayed in some techniques, although the academic knowledge was clearly there. Being critical in your own practice and courageous (but not at the expense of your patients), have to go along with expansion of academic knowledge. Ours is a practicle profession, it is an art, studying books (or whatever media) will not suffice on its own. For example, you have to academically know what you are doing to be a 'safe' manipulator of the cervical spine, say O-C1, but you also have to practice, practice, and practice many hundreds, if not thousands, of manips to be smooth, efficient and effective in your technique, and (the all important) impart the sense of confidence in yourself and what you are doing to your patient. In some ways, some of Bogduk's more negative comments on our profession's abilities are not too far off the mark..... Excuse me for rambling.
Your short reading list is excellent. Glad to see you have Diane at 1 & 2 (just a little regional bias there). Other essentials (amongst so many) you might take in are: David Butler's Sensitive Nervous System, James Meadows Orthopedic Diffenential Diagnosis in Physical Therapy, Philip Greenman's Principles of Manual Medicine, Shirley Sahrmann's Diagnosis and Treatment of Movement Impairment Syndromes. These are all incredibly relavent clinical texts. Every reading you will pick up many things you will be able to introduce to your practice. You might also find the 10 CD volume Manual Therapy by Jim Meadows very helpful for home-directed study (available from swodeam.com). I find visual material like this very useful.
Some thing I tell my patients: don't try too hard... just do it! Advice I should follow myself, considering how long I have been dithering about doing an DSc.... all the excuses I can find: my practice, my business, my family, my personal recreational time..... then I speak to a collegue who has just finished hers.... whilst running her practice/business/family and getting her recreational time in. She said: "I've always been getting up early to do a couple of hours reading before each day of clinic. Nothing really changed for the DSc. I just had to be more directed!" Of course, I don't suppose she wrote messages like this.
Good luck with your studies and practice.