i have attended the ridgeway course. i had previous exposure to the manual so when i went i felt like all the gaps were filled in theory havn't been able to complete the one on one time as yet but apparently he is offering a shorter form of the course for 350 bucks which is great.


now the methodology of the ridgeway method i feel is on the right track except for 1 main point .... symptoms ... he states there is no room for symptoms in the method at hand and that it is only signs that are important, such as muscle spasm; on a one to 4 scale, hypomobility and neural tension and motor control abnormalities wg ...

i have a different perspective on things and feel symptoms play a very important part in the treatment session... i use symptoms as a tool for the patient to be involved in the process of treatment while assessing the signs ... together it gives a better picture and a clearer pattern of the issue at hand.

i feel that the lack of symptoms slows down the process and that time becomes a real problem when using the ridgeway method based on signs only.