If you look at any research paper today you can tear it to shreds because of the bias in the interpretation of data.
Not really "bias" just invalid conclusions. This is typical of the RCT.
It seems like the body is always responding to severe trauma and is unable to cope with minor trauma in a toned down way.
I like you suggestion here. We do cope rather well with major trauma unless of course it is to the low back! (as an example). I imagine though that infact we all undergo minor trauma on a daily basis without exhibiting pain as a result means that we do cope ok with minor trauma as well. The stronger factors from the research appears to the the more psychosocial factors (yellow and red flags) which the body doesn't seem to cope with so well. Hence the influence they have on the physical system.
If you doubt this view I encourage you to wall climb.
I wall climb frequently and yes, constant movement is key. But more key is the use of the legs in preventing forearm "blow-out". I have not read to much on the monks in Nepal who meditate for hours on end, day after day, but I don't think the incidence of low back pain is that great in their sitting population. And they have rather porky tummies some of them