Fair enough neuromuscular. You are right. Having said that, it is allowable to try to predict the result of something before doing a test. It is how the mind works.

Quid pro quo my friend. Have you tried my suggested tests?

I tried yours for quite some time - you still haven't tried mine.

To be open minded, you have to be open-minded If you want to have people respect your point of view, respect theirs.

Also, the scientific process is designed to make the process robust.

Your test is flawed for what you say it does. You rely on bony positions. Bony positional testing is not a strong basis to start from. Having said that, the intra-pelvic torsions that you see can be from so many different sources, it doesn't tell you what it is from, just that hip ABD causes a torsion in the pelvis somewhere from something.

You are right...there is nothing new and your test is not new either. Assess the effect of hip abduction on the spine and pelvis is taught at undergrad level. I know i have taught it at post-grad level. Just because you wish to make arbitrary measurement points either in cm or degrees doesn't mean you have developed something new.

Open your eyes my friend...try my test then have a go at me.

To all, try his test then tell us what you think - i am all in support for trying new things. The researchers i have contacted about his test don't want to have anything to do with neuromuscular because of his stubborness...surely that says something....

...hmmm perhaps i shouldn't write at 3am....