Dear ALOphysio:

Thank you for your reply.

I propose this test since the Wikipedia reference-linkSIJ test is a bit of useless information about nothing related to the cause in the majority.

You have agreed a number of times that the SIJ itself is not the cause in the majority.
I agree that the SIJ is not the cause in the majority.

Therefore, why start with the SIJ test,when it will not contribute to the overall information on the patients's true cause of the problem?
The innominate bone position test WILL lead directly to testing for the muscular componant. It provides continuous information flow that builds on the one prior. The SIJ testing only tells that the joint does not move optimally, but does not give the cause. Structure or function. That the practitioner must do many other tests regardless of the SIJ results - "fixation" or "failed load transfer". It only tells you that you need to do many more tests. The standing innominate bone position test leads to the musculature involved right off the bat and builds on the muscles indicated by the muscular imbalance moving the innominate bones off the standard position. Is that not what we all want???????? Something that provides immediate information on the patient's true condition and is not just a bit of frivolity????
Best regards,

Neuromuscular