hi! thanks for ur second reply to my counter queries
ur suggestions
1)trigger pts
yes ..u r absolutely right..that trigger point refer pain in non dermatomal pattern.as far as i know neck muscles like trep.,suboccipital ,levator scapulae etc.-have referral pattern in arm max till elbow.From ur response i came to know about scalane referral area which is in hand and forearm.my pt had trigger point in trep.so with local pressure on trigger point,the pain used to get referred in distal arm,after treating the triger point,the severity of paresthetias has been reduced but not completely abolished.still pt get paresthetias in dorsal hand and fore arm(as per ur advice i wil certainly check for trigger point in scalenae which i have not checked yet)
i also would like to know the muscles(trigger point) which refer pain in distal hand and fore arm.

2)secondly,objective signs
pt does not have significant positive objective finding which is a bit confusing me.pt's neuromeningeal extensibility was reduced initially,now with neu. tissue mobi. the frequency of paresthetias in hand and fore arm has been reduced but again not completely abolished.(i have seen gradual improvement with addition of components of neu.tissue mobi.)so it gives the answer for one of ur query which says whether neu.tissue mobi has affected the symtoms or not.yeah...but i am not sure about cx lateral glide which i applied during the course of treatment...so i m not sure about lat glide effectivity.

3)one more thing ....according to u which cx mobilization is effective for Wikipedia reference-linkradiculopathy cases
i mean whether cx lat glide or unilateral post ant mobili. or plain post ant mobi
since in this particular case what i found with passive physiological movt test of cx spine-post ant mobility ,unilateral post ant mobility and cx lateral glides........were significantly reduced....any experience with this issue???

thanx