Welcome to the Online Physio Forum.
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Forum Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Country
    Flag of Singapore
    Current Location
    Singapore
    Member Type
    Physiotherapy Student
    View Full Profile
    Posts
    2
    Thanks given to others
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Manual muscle test assessment

    Hi, i just want to know if there's an effective way distinguishing grade 4 and 5 for manual muscle testing. Many books differentiate these two grades by saying max resistance for grade 5 and mod resistance for grade 4, but the amount of resistance may vary widely for different therapist, hence leading to unreliability of the assessment. Through your experiences, does anyone know if there's a better way to distinguish them?

    Similar Threads:
    Last edited by physiobob; 07-10-2007 at 03:50 PM.

  2. #2
    Forum Member Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Country
    Flag of Australia
    Current Location
    Somewhere in cyberspace
    Member Type
    Physiotherapist
    View Full Profile
    Posts
    8
    Thanks given to others
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Manual muscle test assessment

    Such tests are very physio specific and do not have good inter rater reliability, although intra rater reliability is fine. In this case, it goes down to the individual experience of a physio. What you should more look to is a comparison to the 'normal' side, or if there are no 'normal' sides, then it's more whether the patient can constantly push as hard as they can throughout range, which is considered a grade 5. Otherwise, manual muscle tests are largely irrelevant I find, and I preferably use 'functional' measures myself, such as the number of squats, heel raises, bicep curls, shoulder raises etc to fatigue, where what you look for is the point where quality of movement becomes distorted/shaky/compensated etc.


  3. #3
    Forum Member Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Country
    Flag of Portugal
    Current Location
    Azores
    Member Type
    Physiotherapist
    Age
    57
    View Full Profile
    Posts
    6
    Thanks given to others
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Manual muscle test assessment

    In fact it's very dificult to assume a 4 or a 5 sometimes.
    But as the other PT says, put more attention on functional, because maximal test only give you a peak torque in a momentum, does not mean everytime you have an optimal force to function.


  4. #4
    Forum Member Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Country
    Flag of United Kingdom
    Current Location
    edinburgh
    Member Type
    Physiotherapist
    View Full Profile
    Posts
    16
    Thanks given to others
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    38

    Re: Manual muscle test assessment

    i appreciate the concept of functional measures, as it sound more practical. i was told that, chek the muscle test in its full range, and to maintain max.resistance then it is normal.

    for eg. 4grade, wud be someone who can manage resisitance but not to the fullest range. he/she may not be able to achieve its normal range.

    relaibiliy is something defined as how consistent the values are when done in two different occasion of same procedure


  5. #5
    Forum Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Country
    Flag of New Zealand
    Current Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Member Type
    Physiotherapist
    View Full Profile
    Posts
    7
    Thanks given to others
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Manual muscle test assessment

    Make sure as the others have said that you compare with the 'normal side' but functional measures are best when can be used as obviously they are more relevant to the person than just sitting there resisting your pressure



 
Back to top