I haven't been able to sit down at the computer for a few days but I just had to make time for this one. Why? Because I absolutely love a good rant!!! (Thanks alophysio....actually you were quite polite with your ranting!!)
Seriously though, I do have a couple comments....

Lauren Fitness - I don't object as strongly as others to your post. It may not contribute greatly because readers have to actually buy the resource to which you are referring. However, it's always good to see what resources are available.
Looking at the table of contents, it looks fairly thorough; I just have one concern (and it's a big one). Any time a resource is aimed at the athletes as well, you are ultimately telling them it is a simple answer and they can do it themselves. Recurrent injuries are not typically simple and that's why they are recurrent. It takes someone knowlegable to do a proper assessment to make an individualized training program rather than a step-by-step rehab program.

My first degree was in Kinesiology and I can say with all honesty that I did not learn enough information to look at true "core stability", pelvis load transfer, thoracic dysfunction etc...all of which can contribute. Working with teams and therefore under experienced physiotherapists and athletic therapists, I may have had a idea that these were issues but not enough to properly assess the athlete.
With a degree and subsequent years in physiotherapy, I do have that ability (which is evolving with every client and every course) because the education is focused on the injured client rather than the healthy (which I would argue kinesiology focusses on).
So...that's not to say that I don't think that fitness trainers have a place in rehab (because honestly I think that they are trained better in the actual return-to-sport phase...unless the physio has worked with teams / athletes), I just think that there needs to be an understanding of all our limitations.

Now...alophysio...I have to pipe up about something that you said. Not to totally disagree with you but just to support our profession a little more. You said to find a physio that uses RTUS. You did qualify that by saying that " a good physio" can be as accurate but I still have concerns. RTUS is an excellent tool for those people who just don't "get it" when it comes to recruiting specific muscle groups. I don't however think people can not be rehab'd without all the fancy toys. All physios are trained to specific standards and we should not allow clients think they are being short changed by seeing a less experienced therapist. New grads come out with a great deal of knowledge and depending on their experiences in their clinical placements can have great experience to get them started. The difference between a new grad and an experienced therapist is ever improving problem solving skills and how many tools are in their tool box. What I'm trying to say is that clients should not be concerned if they are seeing a "good therapist" or a bad one. The profession itself if reputable and evidence-based. Physiotherapists need to keep up on the research and clinical expertise out there to not only know how to evolve themselves but to know when referral to a colleague is the best option for a specific client.