I feel from a clinical stand point that it has limited uses. I agree with the concept that using vibration does cause confusion on receptors that would inhibit some muscle movement and therefore you could try to strengthen more through range with such a device. However this is mainly of use in the hamstring region and unfortunately you cannot stand in an erect posture on a vibration plate (or else you head feels that it is going to explode!). This would cause one to exercise in a kyphotic/stooped posture or in relative lumbar and thoracic flexion at best when working in a semi-standing position. This can't be ideal.
That said I know they do work in numerous positions e.g. pressups on the vibration plate etc. This might give a useful workout? Perhaps it recruits more fibres when the vibration is on? I'd love to know if they can show that in the research, say when compared to a standard pressup.
Overall it seems a bit like a toy to get people to exercise, which after all is a good thing. Maybe it recruits more fibres (not seen any hard core evidence at this time) and if it does then this could be interesting in maintaining optimal available function in neurological disease. However is it any better than time spent say on stability work with a gym ball that can be done at home on independently in the gym at a fraction of the cost.
Please do post any useful reference or research that truly shows the benefits of this as an adjunct to therapy. I'd love to read it an comment.