Too much talk about damage and having to have things done here. What about evidence based answers.
Unfortunately back pain in general is one with limited evidence base when it comes to treatment or solutions!
No one seems to have mentioned that disc prolapses resolve, without any intervention, over time. Jensen, Albert et al did a very interesting study a couple of years ago where they
MRI scanned patients to confirm disc bulges and re-scanned them 14 months later and the majority had fully resolved without any intervention.
This is true, however the issue is managing the current problem (pain is reported) and allowing the individual to return to top performance. As well chak states that he has reduction in pain from osteopathic treatment (no mention of what).
Interestingly the larger the disc bulge the greater the probability of natural resolution. This includes discs causing nerve root compression.
Next fact: surely qualified therapists recognise that there are plenty of people walking around with disc bulges or severe degenerative change that are not suffering any symptoms and can lead a perfectly active life. Pain is everything, if the patient is not suffering pain (or major neurological compromise) then a disc bulge or degenerative change is of no concern.
This individual is experiencing pain, as well the previous occupation (marines) and age of the individual are important (20). In relation to the article I posted (I know it's long), it is very possible that poor technique, compounded with strenuous and fatigue inducing field training could have resulted in poor biomechanics during certain movements, repeated over time to give a general rise to such problems (similar to that in the article).
If symptoms are resolving then leave well alone, natural recovery is best. Do not have things done to stop you having problems in the future. Treatments are there to get you through a bad episode, not to stop you having problems in the future, and sometimes surgery is the best answer. If anybody has true evidence, not just opinion, regarding interventions that stop flair ups of pain then please let me know.
Pt reports at least 1 form of Rx has alleviated pain (pts main concern), additionally pt wishes to improve function in the future --> thus some form of management plan may be useful
Standard advice: it is normal to have flair ups of pain, this does not mean you have re-injured your back.
How can we manage these flair ups. As well is it useful to take the "wait and see" passive approach to therapy?
The best advice I can give is to gradually increase physical activity, with common sense. The more physically fit and healthy you are the less likely your back is to cause you problems in the future.
Much of the evidence regarding back pain indicates that general exercise is useful.
Here are some interesting facts:
• Of those with acute back pain 60–70% will recover within 6 weeks
• 80–90% within 12 weeks
• 2-7% of people with acute back pain develop chronic back pain
• Flexion/extension exercises massage, heat, traction and ultrasound have all been used as interventions however the effectiveness of each is still being investigated
Unfortunately there is a genetic link and some people just are not made for very physical work. So if there is a family history of back problems, from a young age, it may be best to accept that you have to find a less physically demanding career.
I do not believe this, to reiterate "where's the evidence"? Too often genetics is used to write off much of what can not be explained, or when researchers lack the common sense to make a firm conclusion about their findings. I completed my first degree in Cell Biology and Genetics btw, so I will happily read whatever evidence regarding genetics is available
But remaining physically fit is still important. I hope you continue to recover and are able to return to normal activities as soon as possible without fear of "injury".
To quote Physio.ca "Physiotherapy - It will move you"