Welcome to the Online Physio Forum.
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Forum Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Country
    Flag of India
    Current Location
    vijayawada-india
    Member Type
    Physiotherapist
    View Full Profile
    Posts
    24
    Thanks given to others
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    40

    Adson's Test - Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

    Must have Kinesiology Taping DVD
    Can any one tell the correct procedure of ADSON'S TEST for thoracic out let syndrome. I have searched few websites giving different kinds of procedures

    http://courses.washington.edu/hubio5...ary/adson.html telling this ----A test for the impingement of vascular structures at the thoracic outlet. The patient's arm is gradually elevated in an abduction arc while the examiner's fingers are held on the patient's radial pulse. As the arm is abducted, the patient is asked to turn his head away from the tested side and take a deep breath. If the pulse disappears as the arm is abducted beyond 90°, the test is positive for impingement. The test can be repeated with the head turned toward the side being examined.

    http://www.fpnotebook.com/ORT63.htm telling-----

    Indications
    Evaluation of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

    Technique
    Patient breathes deeply
    Neck extended
    Chin turned toward affected side
    Repeat test with chin to opposite side

    Interpretation
    Positive test findings
    Decreased Radial Pulse
    Distal extremity pain reproduced
    Positive test suggests interscalene compression

    Disadvantages
    Some false positive tests



    I AM LITTLE CONFUSED WITH THESE .............

    Similar Threads:
    Last edited by physiobob; 13-03-2007 at 09:10 PM.

  2. #2
    Forum Founder Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Country
    Flag of Australia
    Current Location
    London, UK
    Member Type
    Physiotherapist
    View Full Profile
    Posts
    2,674
    Thanks given to others
    72
    Thanked 114 Times in 54 Posts
    Rep Power
    346

    Re: Adson's Test - Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

    There are quite a few old posts on Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. Have a look in the TAGs section for this topic. Perhaps you could ask you question to one of those original posts as this will get people already involved answering ans assisting.

    Aussie trained Physiotherapist living and working in London, UK.
    Chartered Physiotherapist & Member of the CSP
    Member of Physio First (Chartered Physio's in Private Practice)
    Member Australian Physiotherapy Association
    Founder Physiobase.com 1996 | PhysioBob.com | This Forum | The PhysioLive Network | Physiosure |
    __________________________________________________ _____________________________

    My goal has always to be to get the global physiotherapy community talking & exchanging ideas on an open platform
    Importantly to help clients to be empowered and seek a proactive & preventative approach to health
    To actively seek to develop a sustainable alternative to the evils of Private Medical Care / Insurance

    Follow Me on Twitter

  3. #3
    Forum Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Country
    Flag of Pakistan
    Current Location
    Pakistan
    Member Type
    Physiotherapist
    View Full Profile
    Posts
    418
    Thanks given to others
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Rep Power
    79

    Re: Adson's Test - Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

    The Adson's manuever helps to identify a neurovascular component of the patient's symptoms. Adson's original description called for the patient to take a long breath, elevate his chin and turn it to the affected side, while seated upright, arms resting on the knees. This maximally elevated the first rib, compressing the neurovascular bundle against the elevated rib and taut muscle. A diminution or obliteration of the radial pulse or a change in blood pressure, established a positive test. Initially called " the vascular test", a positive response was considered a strong indication for scalenotomy.


  4. #4
    Forum Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Country
    Flag of Canada
    Current Location
    Toronto
    Member Type
    Physiotherapy Student
    View Full Profile
    Posts
    21
    Thanks given to others
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Rep Power
    34

    Re: Adson's Test - Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

    I believe, the pulse change is not the only indication of a positive test. The S/S must be reproduced.


  5. #5
    Forum Member Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Country
    Flag of New Zealand
    Current Location
    Canberra, ACT, AUSTRALIA
    Member Type
    Physiotherapist
    View Full Profile
    Posts
    590
    Thanks given to others
    0
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    162

    Re: Adson's Test - Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

    Gilard et al evaluated the diagnostic utility of the Adson test against electrophysiological studies, ultrasonography, helical computed tomography, and plain films. They reported a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 76% for the Adson test.

    As with many clinical tests that is ok but not great news. It means 2 out of 10 patients who do have thoracic outlet syndrome you will miss with the test and likewise you will get about the same proportion of false positives. The way I would interpret that is that this can add weight to your clinical reasoning but you should also majorly take into account the history, particularly the symptoms that could be vascular in nature as well as other tests.

    There is an alternative test: the hyperabduction test - diagnostic accuracy also reported in this study. With this test you can base it on symptom provocation or obliteration of a radial pulse. The accuracy was worse than Adsons particularly the specificity was very poor. However you could combine it with Adsons to try to lower the chance of false negatives with Adsons.

    Gillard J, Perez-Cousin M, Hachulla E, et al. Diagnosing thoracic outlet syndrome: Contribution of provocative tests, ultrasonography,
    electrophysiology, and helical computed tomography in 48 patients. Joint Bone Spine 2001;68:416-424.



 
Back to top