is it me who hears that the machine-happy 4 or more patients per hour physio can use the same argument put up by most in this thread to preserve his/her piece of the healthcare fund pie? can someone enlighten me with a better solution to sieve out the bogus modalities which does actually exist? Are will still adamant that the so called techniques, despite their heterogeneity in practice between the gurus, are physically modifying the patients in actuality? If RCTs are asking the wrong questions, what is the right question to ask in terms of treatment outcomes other than improvement in physical performance, pain intensity, perceived disability...? Is it patient satisfaction? I know a physio who achieves that with free coffee and muffins per visit.