First to say well done to those of you organising the meeting in London. Unfortunately I cant be there but send my support. My own feelings on this whole issue are mixed.
Do any of the rest of you recall when we Physios could accept BUPA patients direct, without a GP referral ?
I do, about 12 years ago it was fine for me to take on a patient without a GP referring.
Same with Axa, up to 7 years ago I was accepted as a specialist and in my occupational health clinic, I could take on Axa patients direct access, and could sign off my own forms.
Do you remember when we could give patients an absence certificate to enable them to be off work? I still have the forms in my practice. But all is now changed on that score as well.
Over the past 5-7 years there has been a huge sea change in the way our profession is placed by insurance companies, GP's, solicitors, and more.
At heart we are now viewed as a secondry care profession, just providing referred to: treatment/therapy. Our professional autonomy has been completely eroded, we really cant accept patients direct unless they self pay. Both within the NHS, where direct access is a joke, because no independent Physio can apply to provide NHS Physio, as Dentists currently do, and the independent sector, where any insurance work has to be doctor advised.
This has taken our profession in the opposite direction from where we should be.
In my estimation 95% of Physio work is NOT autonomous.
The health service is 'led' by the Doctors, Nurses, and Pharmacists.
At core, I consider that the current action by this insurance company, is just in parallel to what is happening through all other insurance companies and PCT's. Almost on a daily basis I am approached by case management companies who seek to drive down the cost of their client's therapy, by asking Physio practices to compete on the basis of cost. This process is undertaken to enable case management companie to maximize on the money they make from each case.
Unless we make a stand as a profession to move ourself into a primary care position, then I cant envisage how things will change.
I feel that this incident could be a wonderful opportunity for Physiotherapists to unite, make a real change in our profession, and reclaim our autonomy.
Firstly, to do this, it is time that either the CSP move from their fixation on the NHS, providing an NHS biased trade union which is of no use to me as an independent practitioner, and writing articles in the journal about NHS services.
Its time that the CSP focus on promoting the profession of Physiotherapy, and not the NHS Physiotherapy profession.
Secondly, and more importantly, we need to answer the question
How we 'sell' our autonomy to the government ?
I'm not sure.
I can understand how the Pharmacists sold themself, because most NHS care is still entenched in the drug/ pharmaceutical industry, and using a Pharmacist to do some of the prescribing is cheaper than using a GP clinic.
I can understand how the nurses did it because a nurse led clinic is also cheaper than a GP led clinic and nurses can carry out a lot of routine health screening, injections, etc
My query therefore is:
What as a profession can Physiotherapists offer the government, to enable us to move our profession to primary care, from secondry care, and therefore to gain the respect, and fees we deserve?
Unless we have this position, then I can only ever see the insurance companies paying us as therapy hand maidens
Cheers
Jay