Originally Posted by
elseohjay
Thankfully, I didn't have to do any additional course as I met all the criteria on second review. The only requirement would have been "Context of Physiotherapy Practice in Canada". I had completed this module earlier on while waiting for the outcome of the initial evaluation. The easiest way to do this in my case was to complete the module book prepared by the Alliance. I think I paid CAD250 or thereabout. It is a very easy enough module to read, you don't have to write any exam, just complete a declaration form and have it attested by a notary. You'll get an email from the Alliance a few weeks afterwards confirming that you have completed this requirement. Note: As discussed before, this option may not always be the best in all scenarios. Depending on your final evaluation outcome, you might be able to fulfil this requirement by completing other courses which also include contents of other requirements such as integrated practice/primary health care etc.
Yes, I had the status: "We are checking level focus of education and recongnition status of your institution" for a very long time. I didn't know what it meant at the time. It is now only becoming a bit clearer. The issue of "precedented" and "unprecedented" cases is still a curios one for me. I am still struggling to understand why the Alliance would chose to ignore prior knowledge and information they have about a particular programme/school and treat future applicants from the same school as unprecedented simply because there are a few changes in the credentialing standard. Surely they can very well identified what the additional/new requirements are and identify that as potential PLAR areas for future applicants from these schools in cases where such applicants have not completed further training e.g masters to meet the new requirement. Sending such credentials for "checking of focus of education and recognition status" despite evidence of previous applicants from the same school is pointless in my opinion and it is the main reason why I think the process is now so slow.
You know, the not so funny thing is, the Alliance just posted on their site that they changed their standard again this January (2012). As my case was based on standard prior to this date, that means all of the clarifications/documentations used in my case will now not be of use in dealing with future applicants from my school/year of study as they will be treated as unprecedented cases under the new standard. Curios isn't it?!